top of page

Structural Proposal                                                              

Cast-in-place concrete structures are very common, with their high strength and stiffness, resulting in very sturdy and rigid buildings, and the material cost per unit is fairly low as well. However, because of concretes properties, a large amount of it is needed to obtain the strength needed for the loadings it will see, as well as the skilled labor to construct a building out of it. Post tensioning introduces yet another prohibitive cost addition in the form of extra equipment and the skilled labor to construct it properly. So what could be done about this?

 

            From the alternative systems investigation, a promising design would be to construct this building using composite steel framing. Switching to a steel structure instead of a concrete structure would result in the building overall being lighter, thus lessening the total load. The thick concrete columns that currently exist could be drastically reduced in size if designed as steel columns, and steel can easily span the same lengths, and even allow for less columns and a more open floor plan. However, the spans in the redesign should remain the same, as it was found in the alternative systems report that the girders would be fairly deep as is. With switching to a lighter floor system, vibration control has to be considered, and this will be part of the redesign to make sure that there is no vibrational issues that would cause issues with the occupants. Making sure that a steel structure would also allow as many levels in the building as the original design, since the overall floor thickness would increase, will also be investigated to make sure that the same floor space can be retained while making the building lighter and more open.

Construction Breadth                                                              

In switching from a concrete super-structure to steel super-structure with these proposed changes, there could be a sizable cost savings in the construction of this building as well as time savings in the schedule. While cast-in-place concrete is very available and a normal construction method, post-tensioned concrete requires specialized equipment and skilled labor along with it. Changing to a steel super structure would address the issue of cost relating to that equipment and labor, as well as possibly material cost of concrete against steel, since steel requires less total weight of material and less overall on-site detailing work. Steel would also expedite the total construction schedule since the upper structure would not have to wait on the lower structure as long, thus saving total cost in labor hours. An analysis of the building systems construction costs and times will be compiled as well as a comparison to the existing system.

Acoustic Breadth                                                              

Altering the structural system may affect the way that sounds and vibrations propagate through the building, from floor to floor especially. Along with the structural requirements for vibration in the depth of this proposal, vibrations and acoustical performance will be analyzed and calculated to check if the new design is acceptable, or has any effect upon, noise levels throughout the building during use.

Note: While great efforts have been taken to provide accurate and complete information on the pages of CPEP, please be aware that the information contained herewith is considered a work‐in progress for this thesis project. Modifications and changes related to the original building designs and construction methodologies for this senior thesis project are solely the interpretation of Jared Warren. Changes and discrepancies in no way imply that the original design contained errors or was flawed. Differing assumptions, code references, requirements, and methodologies have been incorporated into this thesis project; therefore, investigation results may vary from the original design.

News Feed

04/18/18 - CPEP Site Complete and Ready for Final Review

04/10/18 - Submitted Final Presentation

04/02/18 - Submitted Final Report

01/16/18 - Submitted Revised Proposal

12/08/17 - Submitted Proposal

11/17/17 - Submitted Breadth Topics

11/13/17 - Submitted Notebook C

10/23/17 - Submitted Abstract

10/18/17 - Submitted Building Statistics Pt. 2

10/16/17 - Submitted Notebook B Presentation

10/13/17 - Submitted Notebook B

10/02/17 - Submitted Building Statistics Pt. 1

09/25/17 - Submitted Notebook A

09/15/17 - Submitted Student Bio/About Me ; Submitted Advisor Meeting Notes

09/11/17 - Submitted Technical Report 1

09/03/17 - Obtained Project Specifications

09/02/17 - Sent Thank You letters and E-mails

09/01/17 - CPEP Home Page draft - Submitted Building Statistics Pt. 1 Draft

08/28/17 - Obtained Owner Permission; Obtained CD's

08/27/17 - Completed Master List Information

08/23/17 - Submitted Initiation Checklists

08/21/17 - Attended first CPEP Seminar/Lecture

bottom of page